The predecessor of the MA2 was the socketed (double.
> The original "MA" rim only had a single eyelet. Tells you something about variations in rim weight and the absurdity of weighing rims to a tenth They're not even monotonically increasing with the number of holes/eyelets - that The next entry is for the MA-40 and the weights are 472.5,Ĥ49.9, 477.5. This is obvious from some of the other lines where the number of weights The "Spoke Eyelets" column isĪll one phrase: "2-piece double wall stainless steel" The Weight column entries are the weights ofģ2, 36, and 40 hole rims. Perhaps Carl mistakenly read the three lines as three types of rims. 2-piece 464.0 g MA 2 Double Wall 473.5 g Stainless Steel 485.5 g Used paragraph breaks so sparingly you'd think they were made of platinum, or old-stock MA-2s.Īh, ****! I understand the rim weight issue now. Also, the guy who wrote the catalog and web site text Tendency to mistake precision for accuracy.
Bikepro rim table pro#
I'd believe pretty much anything Damon Rinard said over anything Bike Pro said. Many rims as some of you veterans, and I don't go peeling tires off rims to check. The G40, MA2, and MA40 rims I've seen have had similar socketed construction. The predecessor of the MA2 was the socketed (double-eyelet) G40. The original "MA" rim only had a single eyelet. > but I don't have an example on hand to compare. > difference in labelling between the single eyelet model and the more common double eyelet version, > Single-eyelet MA2s have been available on the British market in the past. > could not buy them with just a socket, or just a rivet or in plain steel. > MA40) had the same two-piece, spoke socket and stainless steel rivet (eyelet) arrangement. AFAIK, all the predecessors and permutations of the MA2 (Elan, ModE, Mod3, Mod4, E2, MA2, G40,
0 kommentar(er)
